Estate of Burton W. Kanter, Deceased, Joshua S. Kanter, Executor, and Naomi R. Kanter, et al. - Page 287

                                                -351-                                                   
            tax returns.  As indicated, respondent determined that THC’s                                
            share of the Shelburne and Century bonus payments represented                               
            Kanter’s income.                                                                            
                  This Court, in Durkin v. Commissioner, 87 T.C. 1329 (1986),                           
            affd. 872 F.2d 1271 (7th Cir. 1989), passed upon and made certain                           
            factual conclusions regarding the loan by Delta to Shelburne                                
            under which loan one of the bonus payments in dispute in these                              
            case was made.  Under the terms of both loans, Shelburne and                                
            Century, as the debtors, were required not only to pay principal                            
            and interest to Delta and Alpha, but Shelburne and Century were                             
            also required, under certain conditions, to pay Delta and Alpha                             
            certain amounts referred to as bonus payments.  These bonus                                 
            payments were in fact paid, and both Shelburne and Century                                  
            treated these bonus payments as interest and claimed deductions                             
            of such payments for income tax purposes.  In Durkin v.                                     
            Commissioner, supra, this Court held the Shelburne bonus payment                            
            did not constitute compensation for the use of money and,                                   
            therefore, it was not deductible as interest.  The Court further                            
            held the bonus payment essentially was nothing more than a                                  
            mechanism to divert funds from Shelburne to Delta (and on to CMS                            
            Investors), “thereby increasing the income of the partnerships                              
            and trusts associated with or established for the benefit of the                            
            members of the law firm or their immediate families.”  Durkin v.                            
            Commissioner, supra at 1400.                                                                




Page:  Previous  341  342  343  344  345  346  347  348  349  350  351  352  353  354  355  356  357  358  359  360  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011