Estate of Burton W. Kanter, Deceased, Joshua S. Kanter, Executor, and Naomi R. Kanter, et al. - Page 309

                                                -371-                                                   
            had narrowed the issues on all of the adjustments that were then                            
            being heard by the Court.  Counsel for respondent expressed no                              
            disagreement with that assertion.  Following the colloquy between                           
            counsel for the parties and the Court, the trial resumed with                               
            respect to the remaining issues as to which the parties were                                
            unable to agree:  (1) Whether payment of the subject expenses out                           
            of the TACI Special E and PSAC Special accounts represented                                 
            payment by the Kanters, and (2) whether the Kanters were entitled                           
            to a deduction for interest payments with respect to property                               
            (the Kanters' personal residence) that was titled in a grantor                              
            trust in which Kanter was the deemed owner.                                                 
                  During and after the trial, the parties filed several                                 
            stipulations of settlement.  On May 15, 1995, the parties filed a                           
            Stipulation Of Settlement As To Certain Issues Between                                      
            Petitioners Burton W. Kanter, Naomi R. Kanter, * * * [IRA], And                             
            Subsidiaries, And Respondent.  The May 15, 1995 Stipulation Of                              
            Settled Issues listed a number of adjustments contained in the                              
            notices of deficiency that the parties had settled, including an                            
            “Unreported Fee Income” adjustment for 1986.  The 1986 interest                             
            expense the Kanters claimed was not listed among these settled                              
            issues, nor was there any listing of the other Schedule A and                               
            Schedule C expenses identified above for the various years in                               
            question.                                                                                   





Page:  Previous  361  362  363  364  365  366  367  368  369  370  371  372  373  374  375  376  377  378  379  380  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011