Estate of Burton W. Kanter, Deceased, Joshua S. Kanter, Executor, and Naomi R. Kanter, et al. - Page 328

                                                -389-                                                   
            legitimate business purposes; i.e., to enjoy tax advantages in                              
            the event the partnership interests were sold and/or to “have an                            
            aggregation of value” within the corporate entity to allow for                              
            more efficient investments.  Kanter, Transcr. at 4243.  Kanter                              
            further asserts the section 357(b) issue was not raised in the                              
            pleadings and is not properly before the Court and, in any event,                           
            the Cashmere transaction is not the type of arrangement that                                
            section 357(b) is designed to address.  Finally, Kanter contends                            
            the promissory notes the grantor trusts transferred to Cashmere                             
            constituted genuine indebtedness, rendering section 357(c)                                  
            inapplicable in these cases.                                                                
            B.  Analysis                                                                                
                  Respondent determined in the notice of deficiency that the                            
            transfers from Kanter’s grantor trusts to Cashmere for stock did                            
            not qualify as a tax-free exchange because the transfers were not                           
            intended to serve a bona fide business purpose but instead were                             
            carried out only to avoid Federal income tax.  Although the                                 
            notice of deficiency did not explicitly refer to section 351 or                             
            357, we conclude Kanter understood respondent’s position                                    
            regarding the Cashmere transaction and the bases for respondent’s                           
            adjustments.  We further conclude, as discussed in detail below,                            
            the Cashmere transaction does not qualify for nonrecognition                                
            treatment under either section 357(b) or (c), and therefore we                              







Page:  Previous  379  380  381  382  383  384  385  386  387  388  389  390  391  392  393  394  395  396  397  398  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011