-41- Petitioner Naomi R. Kanter, Kanter’s wife, was not involved in any of the activities giving rise to this litigation. She is a petitioner in these proceedings solely because she filed joint Federal income tax returns with Kanter for the years at issue. After paying a small amount of tax in 1978, Kanter paid no Federal income taxes during 1979 through 1989.24 Kanter filed Federal income tax returns that reported adjusted gross income and income tax as follows: Adjusted Gross Income Year Income (Loss) Tax Paid Exhibit 1978 ($44,386) $1,671 120 1979 (105,084) -0- 121 1980 (155,026) -0- 123 1981 (53,614) -0- 125 1982 (287,536) -0- 127 1983 (819,449) -0- 128 1984 (804,482) -0- 130 1985 (954,695) -0- 130A 1986 (1,529,213) -0- 131 1987 (2,004,257) -0- 132 1988 (1,340,459) -0- 133 1989 (1,331,576) -0- 134 B. Claude M. Ballard (STJ report at 20-22) Ballard was an employee of Prudential. He began his employment with Prudential in 1948 in its real estate department. 23(...continued) individual capacity, to assist them in obtaining business opportunities and/or in raising capital. 24 Kanter paid small amounts of self-employment tax. Exh. 120.Page: Previous 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011