Estate of Burton W. Kanter, Deceased, Joshua S. Kanter, Executor, and Naomi R. Kanter, et al. - Page 372

                                                -429-                                                   
           Issue XX.  Whether the Kanters Are Entitled to a Business                                    
                 Deduction of $104,231 for 1980 (STJ report at 173-177)                                 
                 Respondent disallowed a deduction of $104,231 that                                     
           petitioners claimed on Schedule C of their 1980 tax return.  The                             
           deduction related to a joint venture between two of Kanter’s                                 
           clients, Feigan and Rappaport, to purchase a painting of George                              
           Washington.  Kanter was instrumental in bringing the two                                     
           businessmen together at the start of the venture.  The                                       
           transaction subsequently soured, the painting was returned to its                            
           original owner, and, although the seller returned the full                                   
           purchase price, Rappaport, who provided the funds for the                                    
           purchase, lost money on account of an intervening decline in the                             
           value of the British pound against the U.S. dollar.  A dispute                               
           between Rappaport and Feigan ensued, Kanter convinced Feigan to                              
           make Rappaport whole, and Kanter contributed $104,231 to                                     
           reimburse Rappaport.                                                                         
                                              OPINION                                                   
           A.  The STJ Report                                                                           
                 The STJ report recommended findings of fact and conclusions                            
           of law that Kanter was not engaged in a trade or business of                                 
           dealing in art, and, therefore, respondent’s determination                                   
           disallowing the deduction should be sustained.                                               
           B.  The Parties’ Arguments                                                                   
                 Kanter argued the deduction should be permitted because he                             
           made the $104,231 payment to protect his professional reputation                             





Page:  Previous  419  420  421  422  423  424  425  426  427  428  429  430  431  432  433  434  435  436  437  438  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011