John Karason - Page 16




                                       - 16 -                                         
          a joint member, and produced copies of his 2001 Auto Workers                
          Credit Union account statements, which listed his mother as a               
          joint member.  Petitioner testified that the account in his                 
          mother’s name was actually the KCP business account.  The account           
          did not contain a taxpayer identification number for KCP, even              
          though, as admitted on cross-examination, he was aware that KCP             
          was required to put its taxpayer identification number on its               
          bank account.  He explained that the account was in his mother’s            
          name because an individual was allowed to open only one account,            
          and the credit union did not allow business entities to have an             
          account.                                                                    
               Petitioner testified, and the account statements showed,               
          that he deposited money from his personal account to his mother’s           
          account.  He testified that the money was transferred to fund               
          KCP.  However, he did not provide any checks or other                       
          documentation showing that his mother’s account was a business              
          account or that the withdrawals from his mother’s account were              
          for KCP expenses.  Petitioner testified that he lived with and              
          supported his mother, claimed his mother as a dependent in 2001,            
          and claimed a standard deduction as head of household for 2001.             
          The facts indicate the transfer of money from petitioner’s                  
          account to his mother’s account was to provide funds for his                
          mother, whom he supported.  For the foregoing reasons, this Court           








Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007