- 20 - horses for pleasure or recreation. See Montagne v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2004-252, affd. 166 Fed. Appx. 265 (8th Cir. 2006); Bunney v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-233. On the facts of this case, the recreational aspects of petitioner’s horse activity suggest an activity without a profit objective. This factor weighs in favor of respondent. Conclusion Of the above factors, five weigh in favor of respondent, four are neutral, while none weighs in favor of petitioner. We hold that petitioner’s horse activity during the years in issue was an activity not carried on for profit within the meaning of section 183(c).1 This case is decided on the preponderance of the evidence, and is unaffected by section 7491. See Estate of Bongard v. Commissioner, 124 T.C. 95, 111 (2005). To reflect the foregoing, Decision will be entered for respondent. 1 This opinion only applies to the years in issue, and petitioner is not precluded from establishing a for-profit objective in later years. See Rinehart v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-9.Page: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20Last modified: November 10, 2007