Lisa Susan Kovitch, Petitioner, and Richard P. Kovitch, Intervenor - Page 8




                                        - 8 -                                         
          W. Reserve Oil & Gas Co. v. Commissioner, 95 T.C. 51 (1990),                
          affd. without published opinion 995 F.2d 235 (9th Cir. 1993).7              
          Thus, we must decide whether the current proceeding involving               
          petitioner’s request for section 6015 spousal relief affects Mr.            
          Kovitch’s tax liability for purposes of applying the automatic              
          stay.                                                                       



               7 This construction is consistent with the recently amended            
          language of 11 U.S.C. sec. 362(a)(8).  People Place Auto Hand               
          Carwash, LLC v. Commissioner, supra at 364; see also Bankruptcy             
          Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 sec. 709.              
          There is no indication in the legislative history that the change           
          from “concerning the debtor” to “concerning the tax liability of            
          the debtor” should alter the way the statute is interpreted with            
          regard to the debtor.  Rather, this amendment clarifies how the             
          statute had been interpreted by the courts before the amendment.            
          The legislative history describes the purpose of this amendment             
          as follows:                                                                 
               “Under current law, the filing of a petition for relief                
               under the Bankruptcy Code activates an automatic stay                  
               that enjoins the commencement or continuation of a case                
               in the United States Tax Court.  This rule was arguably                
               extended in Halpern v. Commissioner [96 T.C. 895                       
               (1991)], which held that the tax court did not have                    
               jurisdiction to hear a case involving a postpetition                   
               year.  To address this issue, section 709 of the Act                   
               amends section 362(a)(8) of the Bankruptcy Code to                     
               specify that the automatic stay is limited to an                       
               individual debtor’s prepetition taxes (taxes incurred                  
               before entering bankruptcy).  The amendment clarifies                  
               that the automatic stay does not apply to an individual                
               debtor’s postpetition taxes.  In addition, section 709                 
               provides that the stay applies to both prepetition and                 
               postpetition tax liabilities of a corporation so long                  
               as it is a liability that the bankruptcy court may                     
               determine. [H. Rept. 109-31 (Pt. 1), at 102 (2005).]”                  
          People Place Auto Hand Carwash, LLC v. Commissioner, supra at 362           
          n.6.                                                                        






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007