- 2 - Held, further, because P had a conference with R’s Appeals Office, he is precluded from disputing the assessed additions to tax again in his sec. 6330, I.R.C., action. Joseph E. Lewis, pro se. Linette B. Angelastro, for respondent. OPINION GOEKE, Judge: This matter is before the Court on respondent’s motion for summary judgment. Respondent moves for summary judgment, pursuant to section 6330(c)(2)(B)1 and section 301.6330-1(e)(3), Proced. & Admin. Regs. Respondent argues that because petitioner was offered and participated in an Appeals conference, he is precluded from properly raising his underlying tax liability again in a subsequent collection review proceeding. Because we find section 301.6330-1(e)(3), Q&A-E2, Proced. & Admin. Regs., to be a reasonable expression of Congress’s intent and because petitioner participated in a conference with Appeals in which he was permitted to dispute his underlying tax liability, we hold that petitioner may not properly raise his tax liability again in a collection review hearing or before this Court. Accordingly, respondent’s motion will be granted. 1Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007