- 3 - TO APPEAR MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND ENTRY OF DECISION AGAINST YOU.” On October 17, 2005, this case was called from the calendar at the Boston trial session. Counsel for respondent and counsel for petitioner appeared and filed a stipulation of settled issues between petitioner and respondent, indicating that petitioner was entitled to relief from joint and several liability pursuant to section 6015(f) for 2000 and that no income taxes or additions to tax were due from petitioner. Respondent’s counsel reported to the Court: “We are unable to obtain an agreement from the intervenor to sign any sort of decision document.” Intervenor failed to appear at the calendar call and did not communicate with the Court beforehand about the scheduled trial. On November 10, 2005, respondent filed a motion for entry of decision pursuant to the stipulation of settled issues. On November 21, 2005, intervenor filed objections to respondent’s motion for entry of decision. Intervenor objected to respondent’s motion for entry of decision on the grounds that he was improperly excluded from pretrial conferences that allegedly occurred between respondent and petitioner, that he relied on respondent to fully prosecute this matter against petitioner’s 2(...continued) motion to impose sanctions with respect to respondent’s motions to compel discovery, filed Aug. 31, 2005. This Order did not displace the May 17, 2005, notice setting the case for trial.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007