- 5 -
ORDERED: That, on the Court’s own motion, the
above cases are consolidated for trial, briefing, and
opinion. It is further
ORDERED: That, on or before July 7, 2006, the
parties shall meet in person, at which meeting
petitioner shall present to respondent’s designated
representative all documents that petitioner contends
substantiate business expenses or other deductions or
exemptions to which she is entitled for the years in
issue. At such meeting, respondent shall present to
petitioner copies of all third-party payor reports or
other information used by the Internal Revenue Service
in determining the unreported income reflected in the
notices of deficiency in these cases. It is further
ORDERED: That, on or before July 21, 2006, the
parties shall, jointly or separately, file with the
Court a written report setting out the substance of the
meeting ordered above and their progress in compliance
with Rule 91, Tax Court Rules of Practice and
Procedure, and with the Court’s Standing Pretrial Order
served with the Notice Setting Case for Trial.
Petitioner failed to comply with the Court’s order of
June 6, 2006, asserting that her “busy schedule” prevented
meeting with respondent. Instead, on July 8, 2006, she wrote a
letter to the Court in which she stated:
The docket number 5557-05 for tax year 2002 could not
possibly be applicable as my paperwork shows I only
have 2 cases in Tax Court, for the years 2000 (Docket
19719-04) and 2001 (386-05).
I have no knowledge of filing an amended petition for
tax year 2002 (Docket 5557-05) nor receiving a Notice
of Deficiency for this year.
* * * * * *
I did not receive a 90 day letter in reference to tax
year 2002 and I did not file any petitions, amended
petitions or answers in reference to this year. I deny
all tax liability for this year and ask that proof be
provided to me to substantiate the claims that I filed
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011