Martha Jane McNeely - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         
               Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner’s Federal             
          income tax for 2002 in the amount of $615.  At trial, respondent            
          conceded the deficiency.  The sole issue for decision is whether            
          petitioner is entitled to credit for an overpayment of tax for              
          2002 and is, therefore, entitled to a refund for that                       
          overpayment.                                                                
               Some of the facts were stipulated and are incorporated                 
          herein by reference.  At the time the petition was filed,                   
          petitioner’s legal residence was Gilroy, California.                        
               For the year at issue, 2002, petitioner filed a Federal                
          income tax return, Form 1040A, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return.           
          Petitioner filed that return as a single individual and claimed             
          no dependency exemption deduction other than for herself.  The              
          reported income consisted of:                                               

               Salary and wages                             $21,388.00                
               Taxable interest                                   2.23                
               Taxable portion of an $8,361.36 pension                                
               paid by CalPERS (California Public                                     
               Employees Pension System)                    4,338.52                  
               Gross Social Security benefits1                 9,506.00               
               1The taxable amount of the Social Security benefits is not             
          shown on the return; however, respondent agrees that petitioner             
          correctly computed the tax on the taxable portion of the Social             
          Security benefits, and the tax shown as due and owing on the                
          return correctly included the amount of tax for the Social                  
          Security benefits.                                                          

               With respondent conceding the deficiency, the trial dealt              
          with petitioner’s contention that she is not liable for tax on              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011