- 5 - business deductions" (emphasis added) for 2001, which constitutes an admission that she was engaged in income-producing activities for that year. In light of petitioner's admission and her failure to deny receipt of the alleged income in 2001, it is doubtful respondent has an evidentiary burden. See Parker v. Commissioner, 117 F.3d 785, 786-787 (5th Cir. 1997); White v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-459. Even if respondent had a burden, he has adduced evidence linking petitioner to the income alleged in the notice. Mr. Meadows's uncontradicted testimony was that petitioner provided real estate sales services to Royal Floridian by Spinnaker, LLC, during 2001 in connection with the marketing of time-shares, and was compensated by Royal Floridian on a commission basis (in the amount determined in the notice). We are likewise satisfied that a minimal evidentiary foundation has been laid with respect to the alleged income from Accumen Realty Inc., since respondent's evidence links petitioner to income-producing activity as a real estate agent in 2001. We accordingly reject petitioner's challenge to the notice of deficiency. Respondent's Motion To Dismiss The Court may dismiss a case at any time and enter a decision against the taxpayer for failure properly to prosecute her case, failure to comply with the Rules of this Court or any order of the Court, or for any cause which the Court deemsPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007