- 6 - Petitioner’s pretrial memorandum contained frivolous and groundless arguments. Respondent’s pretrial memorandum again warned petitioner about the section 6673 penalty for making frivolous arguments to the Court. On May 18, 2007, petitioner filed a statement containing frivolous and groundless arguments. Petitioner’s statement also contained disparaging and disrespectful statements directed to the Court. That same day, petitioner filed a voluminous document entitled “Petitioner’s Motions” which was replete with frivolous and groundless tax-protester arguments. On May 30, 2007, the Court denied “Petitioner’s Motions”. OPINION I. Determination To Proceed With Collection Section 6330(a) provides that the Secretary shall furnish taxpayers with written notice of their right to a hearing before any property is levied upon. Section 6330 further provides that the taxpayer may request administrative review of the matter (in the form of a hearing) within a 30-day period. Sec. 6330(a) and (b). Pursuant to section 6330(c)(2)(A), a taxpayer may raise at the section 6330 hearing any relevant issue with regard to the Commissioner’s collection activities, including spousal defenses, challenges to the appropriateness of the Commissioner’s intended collection action, and alternative means of collection. Sego v.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007