Wayne Allen Mootz - Page 31




                                       - 31 -                                         
               fined in IRM 5.8.4.3, Effective Tax Administration and                 
               Doubt as to Collectibility with Special Circumstance,                  
               or IRM 5.8.11, Effective Tax Administration, the offer                 
               may be accepted on the basis of hardship or Effective                  
               Tax Administration (ETA).                                              
               Section 4.02(2) of Revenue Procedure 2003-71 provides in               
          pertinent part:                                                             
               An offer to compromise based on doubt as to col-                       
               lectibility generally will be considered acceptable if                 
               it is unlikely that the tax can be collected in full                   
               and the offer reasonably reflects the amount the Ser-                  
               vice could collect through other means, including                      
               administrative and judicial collection remedies.  See                  
               Policy Statement P-5-100.  This amount is the reason-                  
               able collection potential of a case.  In determining                   
               the reasonable collection potential of a case, the                     
               Service will take into account the taxpayer's reason-                  
               able basic living expenses.  In some cases, the Service                
               may accept an offer of less than the total reasonable                  
               collection potential of a case if there are special                    
               circumstances.                                                         
               On the record before us, we find that the settlement officer           
          followed all of the guidelines that respondent has prescribed to            
          determine whether an offer-in-compromise is adequate and should             
          be accepted to resolve a dispute.  In the settlement officer’s              
          March 1, 2005 letter, the settlement officer suggested to peti-             
          tioner the possibility of an offer-in-compromise and outlined the           
          filing and payment requirements that petitioner would be required           

               10(...continued)                                                       
               mine public confidence that the tax laws are being                     
               administered in a fair and equitable manner.  Sec.                     
               301.7122-1(b)(3)(ii), Proced. & Admin. Regs.                           
          Murphy v. Commissioner, 125 T.C. 301, 309 (2005), affd. 469 F.3d            
          27 (1st Cir. 2006); see also IRM 5.8.11 (Effective Tax Adminis-             
          tration).                                                                   






Page:  Previous  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007