Floyd William Munsinger & Audreanne Elise Lewallen, f.k.a. Audreanne Elise Munsinger - Page 4




                                        - 3 -                                         
          employment as a welder for Progress Rail Services; it was this              
          wage income attributable to Mr. Munsinger that was omitted from             
          the 2004 return.                                                            
               Petitioners divorced in November 2005.  Their divorce decree           
          is silent regarding the allocation of responsibility for any                
          outstanding Federal tax liabilities.                                        
               The notice of deficiency, sent jointly to petitioners on               
          August 21, 2006, determined a deficiency of $1,684.  The                    
          deficiency stemmed solely from the omitted items of wage income.            
               Although petitioners subsequently conceded the deficiency in           
          its entirety, they each seek relief from the joint and several              
          liability created by the filing of their 2004 return.                       
               Only Ms. Lewallen appeared at trial.2                                  
                                     Discussion                                       
         A.  Relief From Joint and Several Liability                                  
              Generally, married taxpayers may elect to file a joint                  
         Federal income tax return.  Sec. 6013(a).  After making the                  
         election, each spouse is jointly and severally liable for the                
         entire tax due.  Sec. 6013(d)(3).  Section 6015 provides three               
         avenues for relief from that liability (sometimes referred to as             
         “innocent spouse relief”) to a taxpayer who has filed a joint                
         return:  (1) Section 6015(b) allows relief for understatements of            

               2  Although respondent moved to dismiss Mr. Munsinger’s case           
          for lack of prosecution, we denied the motion as Mr. Munsinger              
          had signed a stipulation of facts in the case.                              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007