Sharon T. Myrick - Page 11




                                       - 10 -                                         
          automobiles and any other property used as a means of                       
          transportation.4  Sec. 280F(d)(4)(A)(i) and (ii).                           
               To obtain a deduction for such expenses, a taxpayer must               
          substantiate by adequate records or by sufficient evidence                  
          corroborating the taxpayer’s own testimony the amount of the                
          expense, the time and place of the use, the business purpose of             
          the use, and, in the case of entertainment, the business                    
          relationship to the taxpayer of each person entertained.  Sec.              
          274(d); sec. 1.274-5T(b), Temporary Income Tax Regs., 50 Fed.               
          Reg. 46014 (Nov. 6, 1985).  The Cohan rule does not apply to                
          expenses governed by section 274(d).  Sanford v. Commissioner, 50           
          T.C. 823, 827-828 (1968), affd. per curiam 412 F.2d 201 (2d Cir.            
          1969).                                                                      
               Petitioner claimed a $5,338 deduction for car and truck                
          expenses in connection with the Trailblazer which respondent                
          disallowed in full.5  As discussed above, petitioner used the               
          Trailblazer for both personal and business purposes.  When a                
          taxpayer uses an automobile for personal and business purposes,             
          only that percentage of the expenses which represents business              


               4 Although there are exceptions to this rule, see, e.g.,               
          Sullivan v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-131 n.2, petitioner has           
          not argued or demonstrated that any such exception applies.                 
               5 Although petitioner may also have used the Neon for                  
          business purposes, she provided almost no testimony or other                
          evidence concerning this vehicle.  We therefore confine our                 
          discussion to the Trailblazer.                                              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007