- 12 - Robinette v. Commissioner, 439 F.3d at 463 (citing 2 Restatement, supra sec. 229). Under this analysis, the performance conditioned upon strict compliance with the terms of the OIC is the Commissioner’s discharge of the full amount of the tax liability compromised. 3. Application Considering all the relevant facts and circumstances, petitioner’s significantly late payment of a substantial tax liability amounts to both a failure of an express condition of the OIC and a material breach of the OIC. Therefore, we need not decide which doctrine applies. By the plain terms of the OIC, respondent was not obligated to discharge petitioner’s unpaid 1993, 1994, and 1995 tax liabilities until petitioner “[complied] with all provisions of the Internal Revenue Code relating to filing [his] returns and paying [his] required taxes for 5 years or until the offered amount is paid in full, whichever is longer.” The Internal Revenue Code required that petitioner pay his outstanding 2002 income tax liability of $77,540 by April 15, 2003. See secs. 6151(a), 6072(a). He failed to do so. Petitioner failed to pay the bulk of his 2002 tax liability for well over a year after it was due, eventually satisfying his tax debt with his final payment of $56,731.05 on July 14, 2004. Moreover, despite petitioner’s failure to pay his 2002 taxes, respondent’s lettersPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011