- 2 - appropriate to collect by levy petitioner’s outstanding 1981, 1983, and 1996 Federal income tax liabilities (petitioner’s outstanding tax liabilities). Neither the existence nor the amounts of those liabilities have been placed in dispute.2 What has been placed in dispute is respondent’s rejection of an offer- in-compromise submitted by petitioner as a collection alternative to respondent’s proposed levy. According to petitioner, his offer-in-compromise should have been accepted, and respondent’s determination to collect by levy the outstanding tax liabilities is an abuse of discretion. Respondent disagrees, and, for the following reasons, so do we. Background Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found. At the time the petition was filed, petitioner resided in Vermont. Because the existence or the amounts of petitioner’s outstanding tax liabilities are not in dispute, we see little point in burdening this opinion with the history of how those liabilities arose. Suffice it to say that as of July 2004, when the relevant offer-in-compromise (the 2004 offer) was submitted to respondent, those liabilities, including interest, penalties and additions to tax, exceeded $600,000. 2 Consequently, we review respondent’s proposed collection activity for abuse of discretion. Sego v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 604, 610 (2000).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007