Stacy L. Nobles - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
          father of TE and TG, did not have custody of TE and TG in 2004,             
          and was not married to Ms. Fowlkes in 2004.                                 
               Petitioner filed his 2004 Federal income tax return as head            
          of household and claimed three exemptions, one for himself and              
          dependency exemptions for TE and TG.  Petitioner also claimed two           
          child tax credits and an earned income tax credit.                          
               The notice of deficiency was sent to petitioner on October             
          24, 2005.  In the notice of deficiency, respondent:                         
          (1) Disallowed the dependency exemption deductions for TE and TG,           
          (2) changed petitioner’s filing status from head of household to            
          single and adjusted the standard deduction accordingly,                     
          (3) disallowed the child tax credits, and (4) disallowed the                
          earned income credit.  As a result, respondent determined a                 
          deficiency of $5,778.  Petitioner timely petitioned this Court,             
          and a trial was held on October 30, 2006, in Birmingham, Alabama.           
                                       OPINION                                        
               Deductions are a matter of legislative grace, and the                  
          taxpayer must maintain adequate records to substantiate the                 
          amounts of any deductions or credits claimed.  Sec. 6001;                   
          INDOPCO, Inc. v. Commissioner, 503 U.S. 79, 84 (1992);                      
          sec. 1.6001-1(a), Income Tax Regs.  As a general rule, the                  
          Commissioner’s determination of a taxpayer’s liability in the               
          notice of deficiency is presumed correct, and the taxpayer bears            
          the burden of proving that the determination is improper.  See              







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007