- 23 - We hold that the determination set forth in paragraph 8 of the respective notices of deficiency that respondent issued to petitioners in these cases relates to certain partnership items described above. We further hold that we do not have jurisdic- tion over those items. E.g., Trost v. Commissioner, 95 T.C. 560 (1990); Maxwell v. Commissioner, 87 T.C. 783 (1986). We also hold, and respondent and petitioners agree, that we do not have jurisdiction over the remaining determinations set forth in those respective notices because those remaining determinations relate to partnership items, e.g., Trost v. Commissioner, supra; Maxwell v. Commissioner, supra, or affected items, e.g., GAF Corp. & Subs. v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 519 (2000); N.C.F. Energy Part- ners v. Commissioner, 89 T.C. 741 (1987). We have considered all of the contentions and arguments of petitioners that are not discussed herein, and we find them to be without merit and/or irrelevant. To reflect the foregoing, Orders granting respondent’s respective motions and denying petitioners’ respective motions and dismissing these cases for lack of jurisdiction will be entered.Page: Previous 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23Last modified: November 10, 2007