Steven R. Olmos - Page 9




                                        - 9 -                                          
               The business records and checks respondent introduced                   
          establish that petitioner received income from medical and                   
          healthcare payments during 2001.  While this evidence covers only            
          16 of the 25 third-party payors from which respondent determined             
          petitioner received income, it establishes a minimal factual                 
          predicate or foundation of substantive evidence linking the                  
          taxpayer to income-generating activity.  We conclude that                    
          respondent laid the requisite foundation for the contested                   
          unreported income from medical and healthcare payments and that              
          petitioner bears the burden of proving respondent’s determination            
          incorrect.                                                                   
               Respondent did not, however, introduce any evidence                     
          establishing that petitioner received interest income during                 
          2001.  Because respondent has not laid the requisite foundation              
          in this regard, we find that the alleged interest income of $72              
          is not included in petitioner’s gross income for 2001.                       
               Petitioner did not attend the trial, and he did not attempt             
          through his counsel to introduce any evidence regarding the items            
          of unreported income.  Therefore, we conclude that petitioner has            
          failed to carry his burden of proof.  Respondent’s unreported                




               6(...continued)                                                         
          Therefore, the records and checks were properly admitted into                
          evidence at trial, and we do not consider petitioner’s arguments             
          further.                                                                     






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007