Linda L. Pool - Page 10

                                       - 10 -                                         
          times by respondent and the Court that her arguments were                   
          frivolous and without merit, and that if she continued to advance           
          them she could be subject to a penalty of up to $25,000.  Even              
          after receiving these repeated warnings, petitioner continued to            
          advance the same frivolous and meritless arguments.                         
               We conclude petitioner’s position was frivolous and                    
          groundless and that petitioner instituted and maintained these              
          proceedings primarily for delay.  Accordingly, pursuant to                  
          section 6673(a) we hold petitioner is liable for a $2,500                   
          penalty.                                                                    
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              
                                                  An appropriate order and            
                                             decision will be entered.                
























Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  

Last modified: May 25, 2011