Bobby J. Prater - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
          quarters of 2006.  Officer Chapman informed petitioner that he              
          could not consider collection alternatives without petitioner’s             
          financial information.  Petitioner failed to submit any of the              
          requested information to Officer Chapman.                                   
               On September 18, 2006, Officer Chapman held petitioner’s               
          section 6330 hearing by telephone with petitioner’s                         
          representative.  Officer Chapman explained that he could not                
          consider an installment agreement without petitioner’s financial            
          information.  Petitioner’s representative responded that he did             
          not have the requested information.  On September 25, 2006,                 
          respondent issued petitioner a Notice of Determination Concerning           
          Collection Action(s) Under Section 6320 and/or 6330 sustaining              
          respondent’s proposed collection action.                                    
               On October 31, 2006, the petition was filed.  Petitioner               
          alleges that although he was unable to obtain all of the                    
          requested information before the September 18, 2006, telephone              
          conference, he now possesses the necessary financial information.           
          Petitioner thus requests that the Court remand his case to the              
          Appeals Office to consider an installment agreement.                        
               On May 10, 2007, we issued petitioner a notice setting his             
          case for trial during the Court’s October 15, 2007, Oklahoma                
          City, Oklahoma, trial session.  On May 10, 2007, respondent filed           
          a motion for summary judgment.  On May 11, 2007, we ordered                 








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007