- 6 -
Petitioners timely filed a petition.
OPINION
The parties resolved many of the disputed expense deductions
before trial. We are asked to determine whether petitioners are
entitled to deduct the remaining expenses. We begin by
considering whether Mr. Riley was away from home when he incurred
expenses for his vehicle, meals, and lodging in Newark.
Travel Expenses While Away From Home
We begin by briefly outlining the rules for deducting travel
expenses. A taxpayer may deduct reasonable and necessary travel
expenses such as vehicle, meals, and lodging expenses incurred
while away from home in the pursuit of a trade or business.
Secs. 162(a)(2), 262(a). A taxpayer must show that he or she was
away from home when he or she incurred the expense, that the
expense is reasonable and necessary, and that the expense was
incurred in pursuit of a trade or business. Commissioner v.
Flowers, 326 U.S. 465, 470 (1946). The determination of whether
the taxpayer has satisfied these requirements is a question of
fact. Id.
The purpose of the deduction for expenses incurred away from
home is to alleviate the burden on the taxpayer whose business
needs require him or her to maintain two homes and therefore
incur duplicate living expenses. Kroll v. Commissioner, 49 T.C.
557, 562 (1968). The duplicate costs are not deductible where
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 10, 2007