- 2 - petitioner’s 2003 taxable income includes nonemployee compensation not otherwise reported by him in that taxable income. We hold that it does. We also must decide whether petitioner is liable for the section 6662(a) accuracy-related penalty. We hold that he is. FINDINGS OF FACT Some facts are stipulated and are so found. The stipulation of facts and the accompanying exhibits are incorporated herein by this reference. Petitioner resided in Colorado when his petition was filed. In 2003, petitioner received $32,225 in nonemployee compensation from National Quality Assurance USA Inc., $20,517 in nonemployee compensation from Labtest International Inc., $2,250 in nonemployee compensation from Due.com Inc., $44 in interest income from Firstbank of Arapahoe County, and $242 in taxable dividends from The Southern Company Services, Inc. After receiving petitioner’s 2003 Form 1040EZ, Income Tax Return for Single and Joint Filers With No Dependents, respondent issued to petitioner a notice of proposed changes (CP-2000). Thereafter, petitioner filed a Form 1040X, Amended U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, for 2003. On this amended return, petitioner reported that his adjusted gross income for 2003 was $501; this amount consisted of $44 of interest income and $215 and $242 in dividends. He reported total tax of zero. Petitioner attachedPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011