- 14 - Petitioners claimed depreciation deductions for the buildings on the DeMoore farm, the Sioux Valley farm, and the Ross farm. Respondent argues alternatively that petitioners are not entitled to the depreciation deductions because they did not use the buildings in their farming activities, the depreciation periods had expired, and/or they have not established their cost bases in the buildings. We agree with respondent on all three points. Petitioner bought the 160-acre DeMoore farm from the Federal Farm Credit Association in 1986 for $129,000. The buildings on the farm included a house, four barns (the hog raising barn, the granary, the storage building, and a fourth barn), a pole shed, and two silos. Petitioner did not allocate the cost of the farm between the land and the buildings. He estimated that the fair market value of the DeMoore farm buildings was $75,000 and allocated that amount to the buildings on the farm. He used the house as an office and for lodging. He did not use the pole shed, the silos, or the barns in his farming operations. On their returns, petitioners reported that the buildings were placed in service in March 1986, had a recovery period of 15 years, and had a cost basis of $75,000. They deducted $5,000 depreciation for 2001 and 2002. Petitioners are not entitled to deductions for depreciation of the pole shed, the silos, or the barns for any of the years atPage: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011