James M. and Ruth J. Riley - Page 35

                                       - 34 -                                         
          persuasive evidence that the penalty does not apply.  Id. at 447.           
          The taxpayer may establish, for example, that an accuracy-related           
          penalty is inapplicable because it is attributable to an                    
          understatement with respect to which the taxpayer acted with                
          reasonable cause and in good faith.  Sec. 6664(c)(1).  Whether a            
          taxpayer acted as such is a factual determination, in regard to             
          which the taxpayer’s effort to assess the proper tax liability is           
          an important consideration.  Sec. 1.6664-4(b)(1), Income Tax                
          Regs.                                                                       
               Section 6662(a)(1) imposes a penalty in an amount equal to             
          20 percent of the portion of the underpayment attributable to               
          negligence or disregard of rules or regulations.  Negligence                
          includes any failure by the taxpayer to keep adequate books and             
          records or to substantiate items properly.  Sec. 1.6662-3(b)(1),            
          Income Tax Regs.  The term “disregard” includes any careless,               
          reckless, or intentional disregard.  Sec. 6662(c).  Disregard of            
          rules or regulations is careless if the taxpayer does not                   
          exercise reasonable diligence to determine the correctness of a             
          return position that is contrary to the rule or regulation.  Sec.           
          1.6662-3(b)(2), Income Tax Regs.  A taxpayer is not liable for              
          the penalty if he shows that he had reasonable cause for the                
          underpayment and that he acted in good faith.  Sec. 6664(c).                
               Petitioners did not maintain adequate records to                       
          substantiate the deductions they claimed on their 2001, 2002, and           






Page:  Previous  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011