- 26 - cattle partnerships, the sheep partnerships, and other similar partnerships that Hoyt promoted. The fraud perpetrated by Hoyt “impacted over 4,000 people and had actual and intended losses exceeding $200 million.” United States v. Hoyt, supra at 837. OPINION Issue 1. Whether Partnership Transactions and the Sheep Partnerships Lacked Economic Substance and Were Shams, and Whether There Were Partnership Asset Overvaluations and Basis Overvaluations The Court of Appeals reversed our holding in River City Ranches I that we lacked jurisdiction to make factual findings as to whether the partnerships’ transactions were tax-motivated for purposes of imposing section 6621(c) penalty-interest against investor-partners. Thus, the Court of Appeals remanded for us to make such findings. We have done so in our supplemental factual findings set forth herein. We point out that many of the key facts have been stipulated by the parties and are so found. Furthermore, our prior opinion in River City Ranches #4, J.V. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1999- 209, supports the conclusion that the activities of these partnerships lacked economic substance and were shams for each of the years of their existence. The findings in that case are equally applicable to these cases because the facts and evidence with respect to these partnerships’ breeding activities are the same as the facts and evidence considered there. While the proceeding in River City Ranches #4, J.V. involved only three ofPage: Previous 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007