- 2 - liabilities for 1997 through 2003 (years at issue).1 Pursuant to section 6330(d), petitioners seek review of respondent’s determination.2 The issue for decision is whether the Appeals officer abused her discretion in determining not to consider petitioners’ collection alternative. Background The stipulation of facts and the attached exhibits are incorporated herein by this reference. When the petition was filed, petitioners resided in San Rafael, California. Petitioner Theodore C. Schwartz is a self-employed dentist. Petitioners received two Final Notices of Intent to Levy and Notice of Your Right to a Hearing (Final Notices), each issued on June 7, 2005, regarding petitioners’ unpaid Federal income taxes, including penalties and interest, as follows: Year Unpaid tax 1997 $2,052.96 1998 12,861.03 1999 27,040.65 1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. 2 Petitioners originally sought to have this case conducted under the small tax case procedures of sec. 7463(f)(2). However, because petitioners’ total unpaid tax exceeds $50,000, this Court removed the small tax case designation and discontinued proceeding under the small tax case procedures of sec. 7463. See Schwartz v. Commissioner, 128 T.C. 6 (2007).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007