- 3 - On October 11, 2004, respondent mailed to petitioner a Final Notice--Notice Of Intent To Levy And Notice Of Your Right To A Hearing. The notice was addressed to “864 Broadmoor, Chaparral, NM 88021-7504645 [sic]”. In response, petitioner, on November 9, 2004, submitted timely a Form 12153, Request for a Collection Due Process Hearing. Petitioner listed his address on Form 12153 as “864 Broadmoor, Chaparral, NM 88081". Petitioner failed to state his disagreement with the levy. The only notation petitioner provided on Form 12153 was: “ALL FACTUAL ISSUES WILL BE DISCUSSED AT THE LIVE IN PERSON HEARING THAT I WILL BE AUDIO TAPING.” In response, on February 4, 2005, respondent’s Albuquerque Appeals Office mailed to petitioner a letter entitled We Received Your Request for A Collection Due Process Hearing And We Need To Advise You On Procedures. The letter was addressed to “864 Broadmoor, Chaparral, NM 41011”. The letter advised petitioner that settlement officer Joann Mares (Ms. Mares) had been assigned to his case. It also explained that petitioner was not entitled to a face-to-face hearing because he had raised only frivolous or groundless arguments. The letter further stated that if petitioner still desired a “face-to-face” hearing, he “must be prepared to discuss issues relevant to paying * * * [his] tax liability”; otherwise petitioner was entitled to a telephonic hearing, which was scheduled for February 17, 2005. The letter instructed petitioner to call Ms. Mares, or to reschedule thePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007