Wayne Smith - Page 15



                                        - 14 -                                        
          without incurring a penalty for Federal income tax purposes had             
          not yet commenced.  As to the latter consideration, the Court of            
          Appeals held:                                                               
               under the “steps into the taxpayer’s shoes” principle,                 
               see Nat’l Bank of Commerce, 472 U.S. 713, 725, a tax levy              
               can demand (1) that a retirement plan directly pay to the              
               IRS any post-retirement payments that otherwise would                  
               have automatically gone to the taxpayer; and (2) if the                
               plan allows the participant to demand payment before                   
               retirement or at a different rate--including immediate                 
               payment of the entire present value of benefits--the full              
               amount that the participant could presently demand.                    
               Retirement plan distributions to satisfy [such] a tax                  
               levy are not subject to the ten-percent penalty tax.                   
               Other circuits have held that the IRS has the authority                
               to demand annuity and retirement funds when the                        
               beneficiary has the contractual right immediately to                   
               withdraw the money sought.  See Kane v. Capital Guardian               
               Trust Co., 145 F.3d 1218, 1223 (10th Cir. 1998)                        
               (“[Taxpayer’s] right to liquidate his IRA and withdraw the             
               funds therefrom (even if subject to some interest penalty)             
               undoubtedly constituted a ‘right to property’ subject to the           
               IRS’ administrative levy power under [26 U.S.C. sec.                   
               6331(a).]  Upon [the plan’s] receipt of the notice of levy,            
               the IRS stepped into [the taxpayer’s] shoes and acquired all           
               his rights in the IRA, including his right to liquidate the            
               mutual fund shares in his IRA and withdraw the cash                    
               proceeds.”                                                             
          United States v. Novak, 476 F.3d 1041, 1062 (9th Cir. 2007).                
               Accordingly, for purposes of determining whether the                   
          recapture provision under section 72(t)(4)(A) applies in the                
          light of a levy action commenced under section 6330, if the levy            
          on the property occurs as the result of the IRS’s “stepping into            
          the shoes of the taxpayer,” then that action should be treated as           
          nonvoluntary on the part of the taxpayer and accordingly, not               
          subject to either the 10-percent additional tax under section               
          72(t) or the recapture tax pursuant to section 72(t)(4)(A).  If,            






Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008