- 3 - from three sources in 2003. In 2001, petitioner and his former wife reached an agreement that remained in effect during 2003 concerning “parenting time and other parenting issues, and financial issues regarding the children” with regard to their two minor children. Petitioner filed a Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, for 2003 in which he claimed the earned income credit with two qualifying children. With his Federal income tax return for 2003, petitioner filed a Schedule C, Profit or Loss From Business, on which he claimed total business expenses of $48,557. Respondent disallowed the earned income credit and claimed business expenses for lack of substantiation. Discussion Generally, the Commissioner’s determinations are presumed correct, and taxpayers bear the burden of proving otherwise. Rule 142(a)(1); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933). Petitioner has not raised the issue of section 7491(a), which shifts the burden of proof to the Commissioner in certain situations. The Court concludes that section 7491 does not apply here because petitioner has not produced any evidence that establishes the preconditions for its application. Schedule C Expenses Section 162 generally allows a deduction for ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred during the taxable year inPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007