John C. and Joan F. Stukes - Page 16




                                       - 15 -                                         
         his attorney’s fees of $12,750, which petitioners paid in                    
         September of 2002.  During 2002, petitioners paid their attorney10           
         for services in connection with the lawsuit brought by the                   
         realtor and paid $250 for mediation services.  We are unable to              
         determine the exact amount that petitioners paid their attorney              
         because although petitioners submitted bank records which show               
         that such payments were made, they redacted the amounts.                     
              Respondent contends that petitioners have not shown that the            
         Lakeshore property was other than their second home, for which               
         Schedule A itemized deductions are not available.  Further,                  
         respondent contends that even if Schedule A itemized deductions              
         were appropriate in connection with the lawsuit involving the                
         Lakeshore property, petitioners have not shown the extent to                 
         which the litigation costs were related to the realtor’s demand              
         for the commission on the sale of the property as opposed to                 
         petitioners’ counterclaims with respect to damage to their                   
         personal property.                                                           
              Payment of litigation costs may result in a tax benefit in              
         one of three ways.  Section 162(a) governs the deductibility of              
         litigation costs as a business expense.  Section 162(a) allows an            
         individual to deduct all of the ordinary and necessary expenses              
         of carrying on his trade or business.  Closely related to this               

               10At trial, petitioners conceded that they had erroneously             
          included in the Schedule A amount some payments to their attorney           
          that had been made in 2001.                                                 






Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007