- 2 - opinion shall not be treated as a precedent for any other case. This proceeding arises from a petition for review in response to a Notice of Determination Concerning Collection Action(s) Under Section 6320 and/or 6330 that was sent to petitioner on June 16, 2005, concerning his income tax liability for 1997. The issue for decision is whether respondent abused his discretion in sustaining a Federal tax lien with respect to petitioner's 1997 liability. Background Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found. We incorporate by this reference the stipulation of facts and the exhibits attached thereto. At the time the petition was filed, petitioner resided in Mobile, Alabama. Petitioner filed a Federal income tax return for the 1997 taxable year.2 On that return, petitioner did not report any income from Witness Incorporated (Witness) despite having received a Form 1099-MISC, Miscellaneous Income, issued by Witness that indicated he had received $56,370 in nonemployee compensation during 1997. Petitioner was a cofounder and 2 The record does not include a copy of petitioner's 1997 return, and there is conflicting evidence in the record with regard to petitioner's filing status for that year. As discussed infra, the underlying liability for 1997 is not properly at issue in this case. Consequently, petitioner's filing status for 1997 is not material.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007