- 8 - deductible expenses have been incurred. However, there must be sufficient evidence in the record to provide a basis for making an estimate. Mendes v. Commissioner, 121 T.C. 308 (2003); Vanicek v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 731, 742-743 (1985). This is not a case where no allowance has been made for the costs of relocating the Culinary facility, and a substantial amount has been conceded by respondent. Approximations under the Cohan rule necessarily bear heavily upon taxpayers whose inexactitude in failing to keep records created the problem. See Cohan v. Commissioner, 39 F.2d at 544. Here there is evidence that certain payments were made and recorded. From that, petitioner asks us to conclude that the payments must have been either for deductible expenses or depreciable assets and that the expenditures that were made are attributable to a tax year before the Court. The only evidence that petitioner produced in this regard was the list of vendors and amounts that were recorded in the moving expenses account and the testimony of David L. Van Bebber (Van Bebber), a lawyer involved in the Culinary acquisition who had reviewed the document and concluded that “This lists out certain third party vendors that I believe Culinary was utilizing or making payments to for goods or services.” Van Bebber was familiar with some, but not all, of the vendors on the list. As to one, for example, he testified that “It could be linePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007