Vincent Allen - Page 7

                                         -7-                                          
          limitations period for assessing petitioner’s taxes is extended             
          if the taxes were understated due to fraud of the preparer.5                
          Limitations Period and Fraud Penalty                                        
               Petitioner argues that the limitations period is only                  
          extended if the fraudulent intent is that of the taxpayer, not              
          the preparer.  Petitioner relies on cases in which the fraud                
          penalty was asserted against the taxpayer and the limitations               
          period was extended.  See, e.g., Rhone-Poulenc Surfactants &                
          Specialties, L.P. v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 533, 548 (2000)                 
          (citing Chin v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1994-54 (regarding the             
          predecessor to section 6663); Williamson v. Commissioner, T.C.              
          Memo. 1993-246 (same); Richman v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1993-            
          32 (same); Callahan v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1992-132 (same)).           
          The cases petitioner cites are inapposite, however.  Those cases            
          define fraud with reference to the taxpayer’s actions because it            
          was the taxpayer who committed the fraud.  The cases did not hold           
          that fraud for purposes of section 6501(c)(1) is limited to the             
          fraud of the taxpayer.  Nor do we read these cases to require               

               5Cases interpreting limitations periods in the Code have               
          extended them due to malfeasance of return preparers and other              
          third parties, not just taxpayers.  See, e.g., Transpac Drilling            
          Venture 1983-2 v. United States, 83 F.3d 1410, 1414-1415 (Fed.              
          Cir. 1996) (extending limitations period for assessing taxes of             
          partners attributable to partnership items under sec. 6229(c)               
          where partner intended to evade taxes of other partners); Estate            
          of Upshaw v. Commissioner, 416 F.2d 737 (7th Cir. 1969)                     
          (extending limitations period for assessment of taxes on joint              
          returns where only one spouse committed fraud), affg. T.C. Memo.            
          1968-123; United States v. McLean, 390 F. Supp. 2d 475 (D. Md.              
          2005) (extending erroneous refund limitations period in sec.                
          6532(b) where fraud committed by a person other than the                    
          taxpayer); United States v. Southland Oil Co., 339 F. Supp. 2d              
          764 (S.D. Miss. 2004) (same).                                               




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011