Diana Van Arsdalen, f.k.a. Diana Murray, Petitioner, and Stanley David Murray, Intervenor - Page 16

                                       - 16 -                                         
               6.   Knowledge or Reason To Know                                       
                    a.   Background                                                   
               In determining whether a taxpayer in an underpayment case              
          qualifies for equitable relief under section 6015(f), respondent            
          considers whether the requesting spouse knew or had reason to               
          know that the reported liability would be unpaid.  This factor              
          favors relief if the taxpayer reasonably believed when the return           
          was filed that the liability would be paid by the taxpayer’s                
          spouse.  See Wiest v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-91 (the                 
          taxpayer reasonably believed taxes owed would be paid by spouse).           
          Respondent determined and contends that petitioner knew or had              
          reason to believe that the tax would not be paid.  We disagree              
          for reasons stated next.                                                    
                    b.   The Offer-in-Compromise                                      
               Respondent contends that an offer-in-compromise submitted to           
          respondent in 1993 by intervenor gave petitioner reason to know             
          the taxes were not being paid.  We disagree.  The offer-in-                 
          compromise is not in the record, and there is nothing to support            
          respondent’s contention that petitioner knew about it.  We                  
          conclude that petitioner did not know that intervenor filed an              
          offer-in-compromise in 1993.                                                
                    c.   Petitioner and Intervenor’s Tax Returns                      
               Respondent contends the fact that petitioner signed and                
          filed balance due returns shows that she did not reasonably                 






Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011