Gilbert Vasquez - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         
               The enclosed Form 886-A (Explanation of Items) stated that             
          the claimed refund was “Frozen”.                                            
               Petitioner failed to respond to the May 16, 2003, letter.              
               On July 18, 2003, respondent issued the notice of deficiency           
          on which the instant case is based.  The notice of deficiency               
          explanations are as follows:                                                
               Earned Income Credit                                                   
               Per Return:  $2890.00                                                  
               Per Exam:  $0.00                                                       
               Per Adjustment:  ($2,890.00)                                           
               Since you did not establish that you were entitled to                  
               the earned income credit, we disallowed it.                            
               Exemptions                                                             
               Per Return:  6                                                         
               Per Exam:  1                                                           
               Per Adjustment:  5                                                     
               Since you did not establish that you are entitled to                   
               the exemptions(s), it/they is/are being disallowed.                    
               Petitioner first consulted with Jeffrey D. Moffatt                     
          (hereinafter sometimes referred to as Moffatt), petitioner’s                
          counsel in the instant case, on July 26, 2003.  Petitioner                  
          retained Moffatt on July 27, 2003.                                          
               On September 22, 2003, Moffatt filed a timely petition on              
          petitioner’s behalf.  Paragraph 4 of this petition is as follows:           
                    4.  The determination of the tax set forth in the                 
               said notice of deficiency (or liability) is based upon                 
               the following errors:                                                  









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011