- 53 - within the meaning of section 7430. The Congress has not created a roving commission to “do justly”. Rather, the Congress enacted a statute that provides for the awarding of costs if, but only if, it has been shown that the requirements of the statute are met. Compare, e.g., Fla. Country Clubs, Inc. v. Commissioner, 122 T.C. at 74-75, 80-81, with Downing v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2005-73. Accordingly, even if we had determined that petitioner were the prevailing party, there would not be a basis in the record for the allowance of any amount of litigation costs. The parties have locked horns on numerous other matters in connection with petitioner’s motion. We have examined their contentions and concluded that, no matter how we resolved any specific contention, none of them would affect the “bottom line” as to petitioner’s motion. An appropriate order and decision will be entered, denying petitioner’s motion for litigation costs, as supplemented, and deciding that there is no deficiency and there is an overpayment in the amount claimed on petitioner’s tax return.Page: Previous 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53
Last modified: May 25, 2011