Marc and Sherri Ward - Page 10




                                       - 10 -                                         
          treated as a notice of final determination not to abate interest            
          under section 6404(h).                                                      
               Moreover, even if respondent's Letter 853C were treated as a           
          notice of final determination, the prerequisites to our                     
          jurisdiction would not be satisfied, since petitioners did not              
          file their petition with this Court within 180 days after the               
          date of mailing of respondent's letter.  See sec. 6404(h)(1);               
          Rule 280(b)(2); Banat v. Commissioner, supra at 95.  The petition           
          was filed on July 20, 2006, nearly a year beyond the 180-day                
          period after the Letter 853C that was dated March 31, 2005.  See            
          Gati v. Commissioner, 113 T.C. 132 (1999).                                  
               Accordingly, we shall grant respondent's motion to dismiss             
          for lack of jurisdiction.9                                                  
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              

                                             An appropriate order of                  
                                        dismissal for lack of jurisdiction            
                                        will be entered.                              





               9 As respondent has not, insofar as the record discloses,              
          issued any notice of final determination not to abate interest              
          with respect to petitioners' 1994 and 1995 taxable years, nothing           
          precludes petitioners from filing a Form 843 to request abatement           
          of interest for those years.  We express no view, however, on               
          whether petitioners have shown that they satisfy the requirements           
          of sec. 6404.                                                               






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10

Last modified: March 27, 2008