- 5 - safety shoes and supplies during 2003. Petitioners subscribed to the Minneapolis Star Tribune newspaper, and everyone in the family read it. Mr. Wasik wore a uniform while he worked for NWA. He needed to clean his uniforms often because his work involved airline fuel and oil and was messy. Petitioners claimed they contributed some items to charity and made cash contributions in 2003. Petitioners’ Return Petitioners claimed certain expenses on Schedule A, Itemized Deductions, on the joint return for 2003. Respondent examined the return for 2003 and issued petitioners a deficiency notice in which he disallowed many of the expenses. Of the expenses still in dispute,3 petitioners assert they are entitled to deduct claimed cash and noncash charitable contributions as well as unreimbursed employee business expenses. The unreimbursed employee business expense deductions petitioners claimed include expenses for Mr. Wasik’s vehicle while in Duluth and Milwaukee, lodging and meals while in Milwaukee, and expenses for safety 3Respondent concedes that petitioners are entitled to deduct State and local taxes, real estate taxes, a portion of personal property taxes, home mortgage interest, certain amounts for tools, a portion of union dues, and tax preparation fees. Petitioners have conceded they are not entitled to deduct fax machine expenses, Internet expenses, and investment expenses.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007