Wilson D. Watson - Page 18




                                       - 18 -                                         
          plus $3,000, or $7,700) petitioner owes no tax for 2002.                    
          Therefore, he is not liable for any tax deficiency for 2002.                
          II.  Additions to Tax                                                       
               A.  Respondent’s Section 6651(a)(1) Determinations                     
                    1.  Introduction                                                  
               Section 6651(a)(1) provides for an addition to tax in the              
          event a taxpayer fails to file a timely return (determined with             
          regard to any extension of time for filing), unless it is shown             
          that such failure is due to reasonable cause and not due to                 
          willful neglect.  The amount of the addition is equal to 5                  
          percent of the amount required to be shown as tax on the                    
          delinquent return for each month or fraction thereof during which           
          the return remains delinquent, up to a maximum addition of 25               
          percent for returns more than 5 months delinquent.                          
               Respondent argues that petitioner’s language insertions                
          above the jurat and along the margins of his Forms 1040 submitted           
          to the IRS for the years in issue and the protests or other                 
          documents attached to those forms contradict the declarations in            
          the jurat and, therefore, negate the status of those Forms 1040             
          as valid returns.  As a result, respondent argues that petitioner           
          has failed to file a valid return for any of the years in issue,            
          and he has imposed the full 25-percent penalty for each year.               
               Alternatively, respondent argues:  “Assuming arguendo, that            
          the * * * [petitioner’s Forms 1040] constitute tax returns for              







Page:  Previous  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007