- 7 - a result of respondent’s performance of a ministerial act relating to petitioner). See sec. 6404(e)(1)(A).1 Rule 331(b)(4) applies. Therein, it is provided that any issue not raised in a taxpayer’s petition is to be deemed conceded. Because petitioner did not raise interest abatement in her petition, petitioner may not now do so. See Poindexter v. Commissioner, 122 T.C. 280, 285-286 (2004), affd. 132 Fed. Appx. 919 (2d Cir. 2005).2 The record herein fully supports respondent’s summary judgment motion against petitioner, and respondent’s motion will be granted. An appropriate order and decision will be entered. 1 In 1996, sec. 6404(e) was amended to permit abatement of interest with respect to “unreasonable” error or delay caused by ministerial and “managerial” acts of respondent’s employees. Taxpayer Bill of Rights 2, Pub. L. 104-168, sec. 301(a), 110 Stat. 1457 (1996). This amendment is applicable only for tax years beginning after July 30, 1996. 2By discussing briefly interest abatement, we in no way intend to treat petitioner as having made a formal claim for interest abatement under sec. 6404.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Last modified: November 10, 2007