Oliver W. and Harriet S. Williams - Page 12




                                       - 12 -                                         
          Federal tax lien was issued.  Consequently, petitioners were not            
          negotiating an offer at the time the lien was filed.                        
               The Commissioner “may” withdraw a Federal tax lien pursuant            
          to section 6323(j)(1), but respondent’s failure to do so in this            
          case is not an abuse of discretion.  See Crisan v. Commissioner,            
          T.C. Memo. 2007-67; Ramirez v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2005-179;           
          Stein v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2004-124.                                 
               For the foregoing reasons, this Court finds respondent did             
          not abuse his discretion in sustaining the filing of the second             
          notice of Federal tax lien, and respondent may proceed with                 
          collections.                                                                
               In reaching these holdings, the Court has considered all               
          arguments made and, to the extent not mentioned, concludes that             
          they are moot, irrelevant, or without merit.                                
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              

                                                       Decision will be               
                                                  entered for respondent.             

















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12

Last modified: November 10, 2007