James L. and Patricia R. Williams - Page 6




                                        - 5 -                                         
          deductions through secondary evidence where the underlying                  
          documents have been unintentionally lost or destroyed.  See Boyd            
          v. Commissioner, 122 T.C. 305, 320-321 (2004).                              
          II. Itemized Deductions                                                     
               As stated above, petitioners claimed itemized deductions on            
          their 2002, 2003, and 2004 tax returns totaling $34,616, $30,872,           
          and $23,172, respectively.  In reconstructing their records for             
          trial, however, petitioners appear to concede all but $11,920,              
          $10,060, and $9,715 of these amounts.  We limit our discussion to           
          these amounts.                                                              
               A.   Medical and Dental Expenses                                       
               Under section 213(a), medical and dental expenses paid and             
          not compensated for by insurance or otherwise are deductible to             
          the extent they exceed 7.5 percent of adjusted gross income                 
          (AGI).                                                                      
               Petitioners reported AGI of $68,488, $72,364, and $84,501 in           
          2002, 2003, and 2004, respectively.  Multiplying these amounts by           
          7.5 percent yields $5,137, $5,427, and $6,338 for the years in              
          issue.  Petitioners contend that they incurred medical and dental           
          expenses totaling $2,100 in 2002, $4,210 in 2003, and $5,315 in             



               2(...continued)                                                        
          (1968), affd. per curiam 412 F.2d 201 (2d Cir. 1969).  Although             
          some of petitioners’ claimed itemized deductions are subject to             
          sec. 274(d), for the reasons discussed below we need not decide             
          whether petitioners meet the heightened substantiation                      
          requirements.                                                               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007