Fred A. Windover - Page 5




                                        - 4 -                                         
              On June 2, 2003, petitioner’s 1999 joint return was received            
         by respondent and “processed” on July 14, 2003.  Included in the             
         envelope in which that return was mailed was a $13,178 check (the            
         1999 check), dated May 27, 2003, payable to respondent, and drawn            
         on the same checking account as the 1998 check.  The 1999 check              
         was also dishonored for insufficient funds the first time it was             
         presented for payment on June 5, 2003, but was paid upon                     
         subsequent presentment on June 10, 2003.3  As with the 1998 check,           
         the amount of the 1999 check represented the amount of tax to be             
         paid with petitioner’s 1999 return; interest, penalties, or                  
         additions to tax were not included in the amount.  Petitioner’s              
         Social Security number is notated on the 1999 check, but nothing             
         of the face of the 1999 check directs or suggests to what year it            
         should be applied.                                                           
              As it turned out, upon payment after being dishonored,                  
         the proceeds of the 1999 check were not entirely applied to                  
         petitioner’s 1999 outstanding tax liability.  Instead the payment            
         was split between petitioner’s then outstanding income tax                   
         liabilities for 1998, 1999, and 2002, in the amounts of                      
         $10,441.17 (the approximate amount of petitioner’s remaining 1998            
         liability after the payment made by the 1998 check was taken into            




               3  Upon being notified by his bank that each check was                 
          dishonored for insufficient funds, petitioner transferred funds             
          between bank accounts and contacted respondent to request that              
          each check be presented for a second time.                                  




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007