James Benjamin Wood III - Page 8




                                        - 8 -                                         
          of collection, or offer any spousal defenses.  These issues are             
          now deemed conceded.  Rule 331(b)(4).                                       
               Accordingly, we sustain respondent’s determination to                  
          proceed with collection for 1992 and 1993.                                  
          II.  Section 6673(a)                                                        
               Section 6673(a)(1) authorizes this Court to require a                  
          taxpayer to pay to the United States a penalty not to exceed                
          $25,000 if the taxpayer took frivolous positions in the                     
          proceedings or instituted the proceedings primarily for delay.  A           
          position maintained by the taxpayer is “frivolous” if it is                 
          “contrary to established law and unsupported by a reasoned,                 
          colorable argument for change in the law.”  Coleman v.                      
          Commissioner, 791 F.2d 68, 71 (7th Cir. 1986).                              
               Settlement Officer Feist repeatedly informed petitioner that           
          petitioner’s arguments were frivolous and groundless and provided           
          petitioner “The Truth About Frivolous Tax Arguments”, which                 
          explains the defects in several of petitioner’s arguments.                  
          Settlement Officer Feist also prepared and sent petitioner                  
          several documents addressing petitioner’s frivolous and                     
          groundless arguments with citations to the Constitution, the                
          Internal Revenue Code, and cases from the Supreme Court of the              
          United States, the U.S. Courts of Appeals, and the Court.  At               
          trial, the Court informed petitioner that the arguments he was              








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007