- 12 -
investors, in which petitioners and Ms. Mohr participated.13 The
lawsuits were settled, and petitioners and Ms. Mohr recovered
some of their invested funds.14
2. National Association of Securities Dealers Claim
The second type of Cash-4-Titles investment, which Ms. Mohr
made through Mr. Wright, was represented by Mr. Wright to be in
annuities and mutual funds. Mr. Wright received income from
selling the mutual funds, which income he assigned to Wright &
Associates. Ms. Mohr, per Mr. Wright’s recommendation, purchased
through her Prim Securities, Inc. (Prim Securities) account
promissory notes of Rolls Royce Ltd. (Rolls Royce), which was
another CLG used to raise funds for Cash-4-Titles. On January
11, 2000, shortly after the SEC began its investigation into
Cash-4-Titles, Ms. Mohr, through her attorney, requested by
letter that Mr. Wright return her invested funds. On May 11,
2000, Ms. Mohr instituted an NASD claim against Mr. Wright and
Prim Securities.15 Ms. Mohr’s claim was settled via NASD dispute
13See Stenger v. Leadenhall Bank & Trust Co., 2004 WL 609795
(N.D. Ill. 2004); Wolff v. Cash 4 Titles, 2001 WL 34133833 (S.D.
Fla. 2001), affd. 135 Fed. Appx. 329 (11th Cir. 2005); see also
Wolff v. Cash 4 Titles, 351 F.3d 1348 (11th Cir. 2003).
14The record does not indicate the amount of petitioners’ or
Ms. Mohr’s recovery.
15Ms. Mohr’s NASD claim against Mr. Wright and Prim
Securities involved her investment in Rolls Royce Ltd. promissory
notes. It was separate from, and did not include, her investment
in the Blues Brothers Limited CLG that resulted in her
(continued...)
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011