- 3 -
interest in the Michigan property.” Also per the 2001 judgment
in dissolution of marriage, petitioner had monthly income of
$6,755.
Eight years earlier, in December 1992, the Michigan property
had been the subject of sale and purchase documentation between
petitioner as seller and a relative of petitioner as purchaser.
The stated purchase price for this purported sale of the Michigan
property was approximately $136,000.
In 2003, the Michigan property was sold to a third party.
The title closing documents do not indicate that petitioner had
an ownership interest in the Michigan property and do not
indicate that petitioner was entitled to any of the sales
proceeds.
On January 1, 2004, a chapter 7 bankruptcy order was issued
in petitioner’s behalf discharging petitioner’s liability on
various debts. Petitioner’s bankruptcy proceeding was treated as
a no-asset bankruptcy.
In 2004, petitioner married Mike Beenken, to whom petitioner
is still married and with whom petitioner’s financial situation
over the recent years has significantly improved.
On May 26, 2004, in an attempt to ward off respondent’s
proposed tax lien filing, petitioner submitted to respondent the
OIC that is in issue. Petitioner offered to pay to respondent,
in monthly installments of $100, a total of $2,400 in compromise
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: March 27, 2008